Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1951/55444
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/70871
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractMany critical skills rely on the ability to successfully sort out the auditory sensory information in an auditory scene. For example, in order to communicate successfully, listeners must be able to segregate incoming speech from other co-occurring sounds, such as a telephone ringing, background music, car horns, and speech coming from a nearby source. The task of segregating an auditoryobject of interest from other co-occurring sounds is one of identifying an organized auditory figure against the unattended auditory ground. In this project, I conducted a series of experiments intended to contribute to a basic understanding of how auditory figure and ground analysis is accomplished. The first part of this project utilized behavioral methods to determine how the relationship between the object in figure and the objects in ground affects the auditory system's assignment of a feature to those objects. One finding thatoccurred across experimental manipulations was that the auditory system is more likely to allocate a feature to an object that needs the feature in order to be a meaningful object. This finding did not occur as often in more complicated perceptual scenarios, presumably because of increased competition for the feature.The second part of this project was designed to address the fate offeatures in auditory ground. Behavioral and physiological methods were used to determine if features are assigned to objects in perceptual ground or to perceptual groups in ground. The results indicated that features are assigned to objects in the background, but not to perceptual groups. The results suggest that the nature of perceptual ground is not a free-floating perceptual limbo. Rather,objects appear to be well constructed in ground.
dcterms.available2012-05-15T18:03:45Z
dcterms.available2015-04-24T14:44:55Z
dcterms.contributorSamuel, Arthur G.en_US
dcterms.contributorNancy Franklinen_US
dcterms.contributorNancy Squiresen_US
dcterms.contributorMargaret Schedel.en_US
dcterms.creatorGregg, Melissa Kay
dcterms.dateAccepted2012-05-15T18:03:45Z
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-04-24T14:44:55Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2012-05-15T18:03:45Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2015-04-24T14:44:55Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Experimental Psychologyen_US
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.identifierGregg_grad.sunysb_0771E_10024.pdfen_US
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1951/55444
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/70871
dcterms.issued2010-05-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2012-05-15T18:03:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Gregg_grad.sunysb_0771E_10024.pdf: 1716909 bytes, checksum: 217eaba5f4bf67140335f7db40ad747e (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-04-24T14:44:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Gregg_grad.sunysb_0771E_10024.pdf.jpg: 1894 bytes, checksum: a6009c46e6ec8251b348085684cba80d (MD5) Gregg_grad.sunysb_0771E_10024.pdf.txt: 153562 bytes, checksum: aff0f069905b1026a8620264b3324f4d (MD5) Gregg_grad.sunysb_0771E_10024.pdf: 1716909 bytes, checksum: 217eaba5f4bf67140335f7db40ad747e (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectPsychology, Cognitive -- Psychology, Experimental
dcterms.subjectauditory figure, auditory ground, auditory scene analysis, perceptual limbo
dcterms.titleFeature Assignment in Perception of Auditory Figure and Ground
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record