Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1951/59776
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/71333
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractI describe several assays designed to examine how costs and benefits interact in the development of mutualisms between species. A mutualism occurs between alpheid shrimp and gobiid fishes. These shrimp have poor vision but good burrowing ability. Individual shrimp share their burrows with a goby that, with good vision but no burrowing ability, acts as a watch-out warning shrimp when predators approach. In the Caribbean, a single species, Nes longus, which has been described as a mutualist, follows these behaviors. Others, such as Ctenogobius saepepallens, casually use shrimp burrows, rarely warn shrimp of danger, and are better described as commensalists. I found that N. longus more effectively avoids predators while using shrimp burrows than C. saepepallens. Thus, tight mutualism with shrimp is advantageous, especially in areas where shrimp burrows are abundant. I have quantified several behaviors that likely allow N. longus to use burrows more effectively. Why then would C. saepepallens not evolve such behaviors and become a strict mutualist if strict mutualism is advantageous? For gobies, there is likely a cost associated with mutualism with shrimp. To warn shrimp, gobies must remain at a burrow entrances and restrict foraging to that small area. I found that on the same restricted diet, C. saepepallens lost more weight than N. longus. Thus, C. saepepallens may be constrained to a casual association with shrimp due to foraging requirements. This story indicates that strict mutualism may evolve infrequently because few species can overcome the inherent costs of mutualism.
dcterms.available2013-05-22T17:35:11Z
dcterms.available2015-04-24T14:47:04Z
dcterms.contributorLevinton, Jeffrey Sen_US
dcterms.contributorFutuyma, Douglas Jen_US
dcterms.contributorBell, Michael Aen_US
dcterms.contributorHixon, Mark A.en_US
dcterms.creatorLyons, Patrick
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-05-22T17:35:11Z
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-04-24T14:47:04Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2013-05-22T17:35:11Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2015-04-24T14:47:04Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionen_US
dcterms.extent106 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1951/59776
dcterms.identifierLyons_grad.sunysb_0771E_11061en_US
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/71333
dcterms.issued2012-08-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2013-05-22T17:35:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Lyons_grad.sunysb_0771E_11061.pdf: 6858438 bytes, checksum: 8efaa27c9edbd33a308ee3098cd1382c (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-04-24T14:47:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 Lyons_grad.sunysb_0771E_11061.pdf.jpg: 1894 bytes, checksum: a6009c46e6ec8251b348085684cba80d (MD5) Lyons_grad.sunysb_0771E_11061.pdf.txt: 151317 bytes, checksum: a6d5f3c69b016aca42c256fb2cc00fc5 (MD5) Lyons_grad.sunysb_0771E_11061.pdf: 6858438 bytes, checksum: 8efaa27c9edbd33a308ee3098cd1382c (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectEcology--Behavioral sciences--Evolution & development
dcterms.subjectalpheid, coral reefs, gobiidae, mutualism, shrimp-goby
dcterms.titleThe evolution of mutualism between alpheid shrimp and gobiid fishes: a balance between benefits and costs
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record