Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/76602
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractAs Rebecca Whisnant has noted, notions of “national…and…bodily (especially sexual) sovereignty are routinely merged in rhetoric and metaphor.†(2008:155) Departing from this observation, this project explores the ‘existential infrastructure’ of the ‘logic of sovereign integrity’ in which personhood is thought as analogous to jurisdiction over a bounded territorial enclosure. It traces the philosophical history of this logic, and unfolds the post-Heideggerian French critique of sovereignty as an analysis of how sovereign imperatives are animated by a drive to deny the vulnerabilities of constitutive ontological relation, and are thus implicated in violent cycles of disavowal and appropriation. It then applies this analytic to the question of women’s sexuate personhood, suggesting that while sovereign invocations are an understandable response to attacks on women’s bodily self-determination, the logic of sovereign integrity is implicated in undermining the possibility of penetrable sexual subjects and in producing proprietorial notions of sexual interaction which confound our ability to successfully prosecute rape. Moreover, I argue that the imperative toward sovereign invulnerability itself issues in a drive towards appropriation, and is an animating impulse of the misogynist rage and aggrieved narcissistic entitlement that propel acts of sexual violence. Sovereign logics, that is, both undermine women’s sexuate personhood and are implicated in generating the acts of violent appropriation they are frequently deployed to resist.
dcterms.available2017-09-20T16:50:47Z
dcterms.contributorCraig, Meganen_US
dcterms.contributorCasey, Edward Sen_US
dcterms.contributorKittay, Evaen_US
dcterms.contributorVera-Gray, Fiona.en_US
dcterms.creatorJones, Jane Clare
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-20T16:50:47Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2017-09-20T16:50:47Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dcterms.extent398 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/76602
dcterms.issued2016-12-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-09-20T16:50:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Jones_grad.sunysb_0771E_13098.pdf: 4921804 bytes, checksum: 03e729451fd6852f1a888603ee6728bf (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectPhilosophy -- Metaphysics -- Ethics
dcterms.subjectAppropriation, Colonialism, Consent, Feminism, Misogyny, Rape
dcterms.titleSovereign Invulnerability: Sexual Politics and the Ontology of Rape
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record