Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/76762
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractPrevious research shows that citizens' primary source of information about crime is through the media. These empirical investigations have generally focused on the link between news – particularly the content of local television news – and perceptions of and attitudes about crime. Local television news programming, however, comprises a small and diminishing proportion of all televised media consumed by Americans. And while scholars have long suspected violence on television affects viewers' perceptions of the world, only recently have political scientists turned their attention to the role non-news media might play in political attitudes. The present study expands on this nascent literature to discover how alternative sources of media, and specifically fictional crime dramas, impact viewers' attitudes on crime. First, using Nielsen ratings data from 1965 to 2010, I argue that crime dramas have sustained majority support for punitive (retributive) crime policies, even as crime rates have steadily dropped. I next examine this relationship at the individual level, using two surveys from different time periods. Overall, this analysis reveals that the effects of crime dramas are content specific, and impact not only policy attitudes but also the relative importance of other considerations relevant to crime (i.e., racial attitudes). Finally, I link the distorted but systematic portrayal of offenders and the criminal justice system in these shows with the cognitive assessments viewers make about crime in order to motivate an emotional theory of punitiveness. An experiment suggests that the content of crime dramas produces perceptions of high offender controllability and certainty about the offender's responsibility for the crime, leading viewers to be more supportive of punitive policies. Moreover, this relationship is largely mediated by feelings of anger, as appraisal theories of emotions would predict. The dissertation concludes with a discussion of theoretical implications and empirical extensions.
dcterms.available2017-09-20T16:51:08Z
dcterms.contributorJerit, Jenniferen_US
dcterms.contributorHuddy, Leonieen_US
dcterms.contributorLebo, Matthew Jen_US
dcterms.contributorHurwitz, Jon.en_US
dcterms.creatorDonovan, Kathleen
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-20T16:51:08Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2017-09-20T16:51:08Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Political Science.en_US
dcterms.extent259 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/76762
dcterms.issued2013-12-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-09-20T16:51:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Donovan_grad.sunysb_0771E_11572.pdf: 2021595 bytes, checksum: 9d9f234a14e1c384bd4e07b990c94a26 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectPolitical Science
dcterms.subjectcrime, emotions, media, public opinion, punitiveness
dcterms.titleReal Attitudes, Fictional Crime: How Crime Dramas Impact Policy Attitudes
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record