Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/76808
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractWhile in the U.S. routine medical circumcision of male infants has long been justified on medical grounds, scholars have also pointed to surrounding discourses that suggest deeply held cultural prejudices, fears of sexuality, and racial contagion. However, little scholarship has addressed the questions of masculinity, despite a massive polemical literature that swirls around it. This dissertation takes those polemics, and several organizational efforts, as its source of data to understand the “Intactivist†movement as a social movement. Like all social movements, the Intactivist movement has many branches, is organizationally diverse and rhetorically diverse. So, how does the movement coalesce, and where are its fissures? How do they plan to achieve their aims? This dissertation relies on organizational literature, participant observation in meetings and at demonstrations, and in-depth interviews with members of Intactivist organizations to trace the movement’s emergence as well as its relationship to American medical thought and other ongoing social movements. To date, the Intactivist movement has been largely unsuccessful in generating social change. In fact, it’s had the opposite effect, often galvanizing opposition and legislation. Even though circumcision rates have fallen, this is likely the result of changing insurance coverage and costs, not movement rhetoric. But, Intactivists have had some influence on a shifting sense of the masculine self, and centering the foreskin as a political question. Indeed, this dissertation argues that the movement has generated a kind of “embodied success,†specifically through the politicization of the foreskin. Intactivist men, who initially define themselves as circumcision’s mutilated victims, reinvent themselves through movement participation. They transform themselves (literally and figuratively) into phallic heroes, defenders of human rights and also of masculinity. This politicization ties the masculine values traditionally associated with the penis/phallus to the intact (or restored) foreskin. Thus, Intactivism proves the flexibility of masculinity. Even as Intactivists challenge dominant masculine bodily norms, they adhere to mainstream masculine values of lifelong penetrative sexuality, complete independence/ autonomy, and scientific rationality.
dcterms.available2017-09-20T16:51:13Z
dcterms.contributorKimmel, Michael Sen_US
dcterms.contributorMarrone, Catherineen_US
dcterms.contributorForbis, Melissaen_US
dcterms.contributorNjambi, Wairimu.en_US
dcterms.creatorKennedy, Amanda Owyn
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-20T16:51:13Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2017-09-20T16:51:13Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Sociologyen_US
dcterms.extent189 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/76808
dcterms.issued2016-12-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-09-20T16:51:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Kennedy_grad.sunysb_0771E_12778.pdf: 1633266 bytes, checksum: ca8b5c856541f29d34675e98da53c4ae (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectmale circumcision, masculinity, medicalization, sexuality, social movements
dcterms.subjectSociology -- Gender studies
dcterms.titleIntactivism: Understanding Anti-Male Circumcision Organizing in the U.S.
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record