Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/77518
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractThis project explores how dark comedy negotiates between varying and paradoxically conflicting reactions to traumatic experience. These reactions unfold in two ways: the specific moments of “punctual trauma†and the “structural traumas,†wherein illusory structures of the ego – including sex, gender, race, ethnicity, and the sense of immortality – are dissembled and deconstructed. Thus, the traumas represented – in novels by Joseph Heller, Gustav Hasford, Gore Vidal, Chuck Palahniuk, Gary Shteyngart, Thomas King, and Robert Coover; films by Mike Nichols, Stanley Kubrick, and David Fincher – concern characters facing a seemingly oppositional choice between “witnessing,†providing “testimony†about the traumatic crimes inflicted on them, and “disavowing,†repressing the loss of psychological cohesion that has resulted from their trauma. This tension – between witnessing and disavowal – is complicated by the representational question central to both literature and critical theories of trauma: in giving testimony, must a witness present the literal or “veridical†truth of an event, or may he or she instead present the metaphorical or “affective†truth of an event? These texts offer no complete resolutions, but each makes use of Freudian comedy to negotiate between witnessing and disavowing trauma, and between literal and metaphorical representation. Moving from the visceral traumas of war to the more conceptual traumas of identity, each text turns in unique ways to Freud’s tendentious jokes (from Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious) and specifically his skeptical jokes. Shielding both the author and the audience in a protective envelope of comedy, these are “jokes with a purpose.†They question our epistemological certainties, or “speculative possessions,†chief amongst which are the pillars of our identity. The genre of dark comedy is built on these jokes, which present not the overlap or oscillation but a true ambivalence of the tragic (or traumatic) and the comedic (or disavowing). In this ambivalence, dark comedy partially resolves the tensions revolving around traumatic experience, but does not solve the problems of trauma; these texts all gesture to “analysis interminable,†unresolvable neurosis. However, these texts also represent the dangers of eliminating neurosis, including the loss of a self that is sacred in spite of being illusory.
dcterms.available2017-09-20T16:52:51Z
dcterms.contributorKaplan, Elizabeth Annen_US
dcterms.contributorOlster, Staceyen_US
dcterms.contributorSanta Ana, Jeffreyen_US
dcterms.contributorHarries, Martin.en_US
dcterms.creatorSchachtman, Benjamin Nathan
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-20T16:52:51Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2017-09-20T16:52:51Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Englishen_US
dcterms.extent322 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/77518
dcterms.issued2016-12-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-09-20T16:52:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Schachtman_grad.sunysb_0771E_13131.pdf: 1935034 bytes, checksum: ad19ecf858e875c45b9fe96a70998b59 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectEnglish literature -- American literature -- Literature
dcterms.subjectContemporary American Literature, Critical Theory, Dark Comedy, Genre, Psychoanalysis, Trauma
dcterms.titleTraumedy: Dark Comedic Negotiations of Trauma in Contemporary American Literature
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record