Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/77601
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractIf speech perception and production share lexical representations, then properties of these representations should have similar effects in both modalities. Likewise, if the system supporting lexical processing is fundamentally the same regardless of the language implemented, then a given property should produce the same effect across all languages. However, previous research suggests cross-modal and cross-linguistic differences for one property: phonological neighborhood density, a measure of the number of similar-sounding words in a language. These studies have relied on existing words, affording little control over the numerous, and possibly confounding, properties associated with each word. To avoid these potential pitfalls, I created 48 Spanglish nonwords that could be plausible words in both English and Spanish. Critically, nonwords were designed to systematically vary in the way they connect with existing words in each language, i.e., their new neighbors. The phonological neighborhoods these nonwords joined differed not only in overall density but also in the proportion of neighbors that are also neighbors of one another (i.e., the clustering coefficient), and the number of neighbors that share the same onset or offset phoneme. In this way, the present research was designed to assess the role of clustering and position-specific neighbors in driving the phonological neighborhood density effects observed in English and Spanish. Results suggest that, while clustering and overall neighborhood density slows speech processing, offset neighbors facilitate perception and onset neighbors facilitate production. This, coupled with the fact that English neighbors tend to share onsets while Spanish neighbors tend to share offsets, can explain the previously observed cross-modal and cross-linguistic differences.
dcterms.available2017-09-20T16:52:57Z
dcterms.contributorSamuel, Arthur Gen_US
dcterms.contributorBrennan, Susanen_US
dcterms.contributorFreitas, Antonioen_US
dcterms.contributorHuffman, Marie.en_US
dcterms.creatorPufahl, April
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-20T16:52:57Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2017-09-20T16:52:57Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Experimental Psychology.en_US
dcterms.extent125 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/77601
dcterms.issued2014-12-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-09-20T16:52:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Pufahl_grad.sunysb_0771E_12154.pdf: 2179098 bytes, checksum: 5600859bf014b2736794410184bf78b6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectclustering coefficient, cohort neighbors, phonological neighborhood density, rhyme neighbors, speech production, spoken word recognition
dcterms.subjectCognitive psychology
dcterms.title" Bienvenido al vecindario" : Inserting Spanglish nonwords into English versus Spanish phonological neighborhoods.
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record