| dcterms.abstract | Government support is a popular instrument to foster technology innovation. It can take various forms such as financial aid, tax credits, and technological assistance. Along with the firm characteristics, strategic behavior of the project team, characteristics of the technology and the market, and the regulatory environment, government support influences firms’ research and development (R&D) motivations, decision making process, and hence technology development performance. How government support influences the performance in different industries is an important policy and research question. There are many studies on the effectiveness and impacts of government support, mostly at program-level or industry-level. Government Championship is a form of government support distinct from direct financial or technological assistance. Championship includes expressing confidence in the innovation, encouraging others to support the innovation, and persisting under adversity. Championship has been studied as a critical inside factor for innovation success, particularly at project-level. Usually a champion emerged within the organization responsible for the innovation project. However, with the intention to encourage technology development, governments can also play a championship role. Government championship, besides government financial and technological assistance (hereafter “government F&T”), could be one major category of government support to facilitate high-technology innovation. However, there are few studies focusing on the effectiveness of government championship, and how it influences the innovation process. This thesis addresses this question through two studies on high-technology development projects. The first study has tested the effectiveness of government championship on the performance of 431 government sponsored technology innovation projects. Government championship and government F&T, as well as project team strategic behavior, are hypothesized to influence the technology innovation performance. The team strategy has two dimensions in this model: pro-activeness and defensiveness, which indicate the emphasis of the team on exploiting new opportunities, and enhancing the current methods, respectively. A survey was administered to the project managers of li-ion battery projects in the United States. After data was collected, factor analysis and regression were used to test hypotheses. The results suggest that both government championship and government F&T are positive factors in technology innovation performance, while strategic behaviors are positive and more significant. The results also suggest a strong correlation between government support (both championship and F&T assistance) and the R&D team strategy, which means government intervention and team strategic behavior could affect each other. To understand how the government champions and the project team impact each other during the project, the second study employed a single in-depth case study, investigating the Shenhua Direct-Coal-Liquefaction (DCL) Project. A variety of government championship behaviors have been identified, and their situation and impacts on the project performance and outcome were analyzed. This case is a good start to accumulate information and observations for a better understanding of the influences of government championship in technology innovation. These two studies will help increase understanding of how government championship behaviors influence the process, the project performance, and the outcome of technology innovation, particularly in high-technology industries. | |
