Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/78209
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degreeen_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractIn the first part “Competitive Intelligence and Disclosure of Cost Information in Duopoly”, I consider a duopoly in which one firm can invest in competitive intelligence (CI) to learn its rival’s private cost before market competition. I show in equilibrium the firm invests in CI makes higher expected net profit than when it doesn’t invest. Ex ante both the firm being “spied” and the industry benefit (suffer) from CI under Cournot (Bertrand) competition while consumer surplus suffers under both types of competition. Overall CI in this environment enhances (reduces) social welfare when firms compete in Cournot (Bertrand) fashion. When the firm that invests in CI can disclose its private signal about rival’s cost credibly and costlessly, due to unraveling argument there’s full disclosure in equilibrium under both Cournot and Bertrand competition and the main results still hold qualitatively. Disclosure of private signal can increase or decrease the firm’s incentive to invest in CI, depending on the degree of convexity of the cost function associated with CI. In the second part “Information Acquisition, Signaling and Learning in Duopoly”, I study firms' incentives to acquire private information in a duopoly signaling game. Due to signaling, firms' first-period equilibrium prices are distorted above the optimal static prices. It is show that while firms benefit from obtaining more precise private information, the value of information is reduced by the price distortion due to signaling. Thus, compared with firms that do not attempt to manipulate rivals' beliefs, signaling firms acquire less precise information. An industry-wide trade-association acquiring information increases firm profit and may also increase consumer surplus, so allowing such collective action may be in the interest of competition authorities.
dcterms.available2018-03-22T22:39:19Z
dcterms.contributorBrusco, Sandro.en_US
dcterms.contributorTauman, Yairen_US
dcterms.contributorLiu, Tingen_US
dcterms.contributorJelnov, Artyom.en_US
dcterms.creatorWANG, TAO
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-03-22T22:39:19Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2018-03-22T22:39:19Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Economics.en_US
dcterms.extent83 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/78209
dcterms.issued2017-08-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2018-03-22T22:39:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 WANG_grad.sunysb_0771E_13378.pdf: 832449 bytes, checksum: 1f58c8a9054591a897ff0a65633917f5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-08-01en
dcterms.subjectEconomic theory
dcterms.subjectBertrand competition
dcterms.subjectcost uncertainty
dcterms.subjectCournot competition
dcterms.subjectinformation acquisition
dcterms.subjectprofit and welfare
dcterms.titleEssays on Information Acquisition in Industrial Organization
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record