Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/76759
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractThis dissertation examines causes and consequences of ideological perception and theorizes that these judgments are fueled by both conscious and subconscious affect, as proposed by the hot cognition model and the motivated reasoning framework. The first empirical chapter, which stands separate from the others, uses fixed effects NES panel data to demonstrate that ideological perceptions of the party in power impact citizen preferences for federal spending. The second empirical chapter uses an experimental survey to demonstrate that conscious and subconscious affect impact ideological perceptions of fictitious candidates while simultaneously testing a previous finding that Democrats are perceived as more ideological than equally extreme Republicans. The third empirical chapter uses another experimental survey to test if certain policy sets (religious, economic, foreign etc.) are perceived as more ideologically extreme than others. It also hypothesizes that certain political personality types such as authoritarians and libertarians will feel threatened by specific policy sets, generate greater negative affect towards those policies and then select them as the most ideologically extreme in a comparison process. The principle finding of the dissertation is affect that is unrelated to policy evaluation (and likely subconscious) plays a role shaping how we perceive the ideological extremity of others.
dcterms.available2017-09-20T16:51:08Z
dcterms.contributorTaber, Charlesen_US
dcterms.contributorLebo, Matthewen_US
dcterms.contributorJerit, Jenniferen_US
dcterms.contributorRedlawsk, David.en_US
dcterms.creatorAmira, Karyn Ann
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-20T16:51:08Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2017-09-20T16:51:08Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Political Science.en_US
dcterms.extent138 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/76759
dcterms.issued2015-12-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-09-20T16:51:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Amira_grad.sunysb_0771E_12491.pdf: 4165915 bytes, checksum: a8479249ec1a3253192f4d9cfee6b895 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectPolitical science
dcterms.subjectCognition, Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, Perception, Public Opinion
dcterms.titleIdeological Extremity Perception: Causes and Consequences
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record