Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/77752
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractFeatures providing natural protection against erosion and flooding are defined in the laws of New York State to include dunes, bluffs, and beaches. In addition, structural hazard areas are defined to be stretches of the coast where the long-term recession rate is greater than one foot per year. LiDAR data was used to identify NPFs and examine shoreline recession rates at 750 transects along the south shore of eastern Long Island. Meaningful combinations of NPFs included dunes in front of bluffs, dunes formed on top of bluffs and multiple dunes. Single dunes were the NPFs along 27.1% of the shoreline; multiple dunes comprising 20.7%. Bluffs were the NPF along 26.6% of the shoreline. Dunes in front of a bluff comprised 12.1% and dune on top of a bluff crest made up 12.9%. (The remaining 0.6% of the shoreline was identified as the beach). Dunes provide the first line of defense against extreme events, but in the face of a long-term rise in sea level, the excavation of the bluff face is likely to be the factor controlling shoreline retreat. Combination of NPFs do not necessarily equate to high (or low) resilience. Shoreline recession rates were calculated as a linear regression of high-water shorelines from 1983, 1999, 2003, 2010 and 2013. Calculated recession rates were biased by the occurrence of longshore sandwaves. These features were found to occur between 23% and 82% of the time. Spectra analysis shows a dominant wavelength of shoreline recession rate to be 1.5 km. The cause of sandwaves are debatable, but their presence can impact the calculation of recession rates. A shore-process model (CSHORE) using wave and surge data for a 12-day period based on Superstorm Sandy were used predicted that the beach profile would have lost an average volume of 68 m3/m but ranged up to 137 m3/m. Model results were about twice those observed using LiDAR data after Hurricane Sandy, but neither that event or earlier historical events seemed to permanently alter the response of the shoreline to later conditions.
dcterms.available2017-09-20T16:53:30Z
dcterms.contributorFarhadzadeh, Alien_US
dcterms.contributorBokuniewicz, Henryen_US
dcterms.contributorZarillo, Garyen_US
dcterms.contributorWilson, Roberten_US
dcterms.contributorBatten, Brianen_US
dcterms.contributor.en_US
dcterms.creatorHuang, Hanlu
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-20T16:53:30Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2017-09-20T16:53:30Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Marine and Atmospheric Scienceen_US
dcterms.extent135 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/77752
dcterms.issued2016-12-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-09-20T16:53:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Huang_grad.sunysb_0771E_13150.pdf: 9128513 bytes, checksum: 38b81abcb56669cc03dd8ee4951df6b8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectCSHORE, Longshore Undulation, Natural Protective Feature
dcterms.subjectGeology -- Ocean engineering
dcterms.titleNatural Protective Features Along New York's Ocean Shoreline and Their Response to Extreme Events
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record